This is a more appropriate name now that it does more stuff than allocate virtual memory.
To be fair, the name was a bit awkward anyway. Should have been UserVMAllocator I guess.
Some pages, such as framebuffer pages, are not physical memory frames reserved for the current process.
Some, such as the framebuffer, may be shared between all processes.
Yet, on exit() or on exec(), a process frees all frames mapped into its address spaces.
And on fork(), it copies all data between frames. So how could we map framebuffers.
Simple: we use one of the bits in page table entries which are available to the OS, and mark whether that page is owned by the current process.
If it is owned, it will be:
- Freed on address space destruction
- Its data will be copied to a new page owned by the child process on fork()
If it is not owned, it will be:
- Left alone on address space destruction
- On fork(), the child's virtual page will be mapped to the same physical frame as the parent
This still needs a bit more work, such as keeping a reference of how many processes use a page to free it when all processes using it exit/exec.
This should be done for MAP_SHARED mappings, for example, since they are not permanent forever,
unlike the framebuffer for example.
The only thing doing weird stuff is exec(), so that's commented out and throws ENOSYS right now.
But we have two user tasks running in parallel, isolated from each other!
